Absurdism vs Existentialism: Which One Are You?

By Inner Quests4 min read
absurdism
existentialism
camus
sartre
philosophy
meaning

People mix these up constantly, which is understandable because they start from the same place. Both take the absence of inherent meaning seriously. But where they go from there is completely different, and which one resonates with you says something real about how you're wired.


They agree on the problem, disagree on the solution

Both Sartre (existentialism) and Camus (absurdism) accepted that the universe has no built-in meaning or purpose. No cosmic script, no pre-assigned role, no God handing down instructions. That's the shared starting point.

The split comes in what you do with that.

Sartre's answer was: create your own meaning. You're radically free, you define yourself through choices, and that freedom is both the burden and the dignity of being human. Anxiety is the honest response to that freedom - you can't escape it, but you can use it. Authenticity means making your choices fully, owning them, not hiding behind roles or excuses.

Camus thought this move was a kind of cheating. He called it "philosophical suicide" - jumping from "there's no inherent meaning" to "therefore I'll create my own" without really sitting with the problem. His argument was that the absurd is a relationship, not a condition. It's the gap between humans desperately wanting meaning and a universe that stubbornly refuses to provide it. That gap doesn't get resolved. It has to be lived.

His answer was revolt. You keep pushing the boulder up the hill knowing it'll roll back down - not because you've convinced yourself it matters, but because the act of continuing, eyes open, is itself a refusal to surrender to meaninglessness.


The clearest way to tell them apart

Ask yourself: when you think about the absence of inherent meaning, what's your instinct?

If your instinct is to roll up your sleeves and build something - to define yourself through projects and commitments and choices that are entirely yours - you're probably more Existentialist. Sartre's framework rewards people who find freedom energizing, who feel most alive when authoring their own story.

If your instinct is more like a quiet, almost defiant shrug - if you find something honest and even darkly funny about the gap between what we want from life and what life actually offers - you're probably more Absurdist. Camus appeals to people who are comfortable sitting with unresolved tension rather than needing to solve it.

The Existentialist builds a meaning and lives inside it. The Absurdist stays in the open air, acknowledging the gap, and keeps moving anyway.


Why this isn't just a personality test question

Both positions have real consequences for how you live.

The Existentialist emphasis on radical freedom and self-creation can become exhausting. If you're entirely responsible for who you are, then every failure is also entirely yours. There's no "circumstances" to absorb the blame. Sartre acknowledged this - he called it the "anguish" of freedom. Some people find this clarifying. Others find it crushing.

Camus's absurdism is in some ways more forgiving. It doesn't ask you to create a grand coherent self. It just asks you to keep showing up. The standard isn't "have you built a meaningful life" but "are you still in the fight." That lower ceiling can be a relief, or it can feel like giving up.

Most people who've read both end up somewhere between them, depending on the season. Existentialism for when you have energy and want to build. Absurdism for when the building doesn't seem to be going anywhere and you just need a reason to keep moving.


One thing they both get right

Neither one lets you off the hook.

Existentialism says you can't blame your circumstances for who you are. Absurdism says you can't use the meaninglessness of the universe as a reason to stop. Different routes to the same place: you're responsible for what you do with your life, even though nothing handed you a reason to do anything.

That's actually a pretty demanding position, dressed up in the language of revolt and freedom.

If you're curious exactly where you fall - and whether other traditions like Stoicism or Buddhism are shaping your thinking more than you realize - Inner Quests maps your philosophical profile in detail. Take the assessment.